Widely adopted personality tests and tests for creativity have become one of the most familiar examples of scientific positivism in the study of human psychology. By their nature, however, they cannot succeed at what they claim to do. A science of ‘creativity’ that excludes artistic and literary expression has much to do with a commercial society’s efforts to co-opt the full range of human experience, and very little to do with the qualities that make that experience the extraordinary and irreducible phenomenon that it is.
-
Categories
-
Web Links
-
Pages
-
Recent Comments
- Gerald Barnett on Why The Liberal Arts?
- gold price on Shadowboxing
- Cheap North Face on Why Dieting is Hard for Uncle Sam
- Sylvia Kraemer on Creativity Rocks!
- Gwyneth Fries on Creativity Rocks!
-
Recent Posts
-
Tags
18th century Enlightenment Adam Smith American Cancer Society annual mammogram Atomic Energy Commission Bayh-Dole breast cancer Climate Change Daniel S. Greenberg Department of Defense EPA standards federal procurements federal R&D FOIA Forsham v. Harris Freedom of Information Act Free Market Global Warming Human Genome Project intellectual capital Justice John McLean Karl Popper King Diarrmait Maine mammography screening National Aeronautics and Space Administration National Cancer Institute National Institutes of Health Office of Management and Budget patent licenses patents President Bill Clinton President Kennedy President Truman Prime Minister Tony Blair privatization proprietary claims public commons Publicly Funded Research public sphere Ronald Reagan Sarah Palin screening mammography Shelby Amendment Wheaton v. Peters -
Meta